HiyaJeromeC wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2024 10:42 am Everybody is now (logically) thinking : if *this* was done by *that* team on this particular project, and we can see for a long time that this team has been grossly dominating the competition (at least the sprints, but not only), it is no surprise that we all think that this team probably had a similar behavior on other projects.
But of course it requires technical skills and investigation time to find elements that could lead to further conclusions, that I will not make.
The issue is that these "benchmark hacks" are known about and *anyone* can cheat. So, investigating EVERY BOINC volunteer is impossible.
And yes, it does mean that if anyone cheats, then any league table, on FB, on BOINCstats, on Free-DC, that relies on the projects to provide statistical data on how many credits each member and each team has been awarded, is going to be based on people who are being dishonest.
So, in an ideal world, the projects should do more to ensure that all credits are valid, and commensurate with the efforts made by each CPU and each GPU. Some projects are already doing this and others might not be.
But it would be good if the originators of the BOINC software made it impossible for cheating to take place by preventing the benchmarks from being edited and by the BOINC validation system preventing credits being awarded which are vastly higher than the average (for any specific CPU and/or GPU).
regards
Tim