Search found 4 matches

by otax
Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:30 pm
Forum: Rules
Topic: Rules in 2011
Replies: 9
Views: 35378

Re: Rules in 2011

> Mankka* I agree with the term "qualifying" meaning that a project meets the necessary requirements to appear in FB. So I will use it, and that could be naturally integrated in texts. Regarding the Bonus point for "pole position", why not ? 1 or more points, but that will be dis...
by otax
Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:08 pm
Forum: Rules
Topic: Rules in 2011
Replies: 9
Views: 35378

Re: Rules in 2011

Sebastien finished already. :jap: Many thanks for his efficient work. So here is the comparison of 2010 ranking with the 2 systems of points. No change before Place 17. It seems interesting to follow the Automotive F1 ranking because it keeps FB points system close to an already official system. As ...
by otax
Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:55 pm
Forum: Rules
Topic: Rules in 2011
Replies: 9
Views: 35378

Re: Rules in 2011

Yes, that's it. In order to have universally known bases for Formula Boinc, we choosed in 2007 the same system of points as the Automotive F1 for Grand Prix ranking. Now it has changed this year so it should be a good reason to follow it. After discussion with Sebastien, he will prepare a simulation...
by otax
Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:24 pm
Forum: Rules
Topic: New rules proposal
Replies: 12
Views: 61525

Re: New rules proposal

To be more precise, it should be said that Permanent Testing or Uppercase Testing Projects may be integrated in the course of the year in FB when they have distributed more than 1,000,000 credits of NON-Test Work Units. All Test Work Units credits formerly attributed are in that case not existing re...